Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- tutoriaux:install-email-server:install-email-server-part-5 [2023/01/06 16:41] – supprimée - modification externe (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
+++ tutoriaux:install-email-server:install-email-server-part-5 [2023/01/06 16:55] (Version actuelle) – ↷ Liens modifiés en raison d'un déplacement. frater
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
+====== Build Email Server From Scratch on Debian – Part 5 - DMARC to Protect Your Domain From Email Spoofing ======
+In [[tutoriaux:install-email-server:install-email-server-part-4|part 4]] of building your own email server tutorial series, we implemented SPF and DKIM records to improve email deliverability. In this part, we’re going to look at another email authentication technology: **DMARC**. We will discuss how DMARC can benefit you, how to create DMARC record and interpret DMARC report.
+===== What is DMARC? =====
+DMARC stands for **D**omain-based **M**essage **A**uthentication, **R**eporting and **C**onformance. DMARC is not a product. It’s a freely available technical specification and widely supported across the Internet. Anyone owning a domain name can take advantage of DMARC.
+A DMARC policy allows a domain owner to indicate that emails from his/her domain is protected by SPF and DKIM. You can use DMARC to discover all legitimate sources of email. DMARC builds upon two existing technologies: SPF and DKIM.
+===== DMARC Benefits =====
+Why is DMARC good for you? The benefits of deploying DMARC are:
+  * **Fraud detection**: Phishers often spoof the From: header address to impersonate big brands. DMARC is a powerful tool to fight against email phishing and thus protect your brand.
+  * **Simplified email delivery**: Sending DMARC-compliant email allows receiving email servers to simplify filtering rules.
+  * Your email **domain reputation** can be improved after you create DMARC record correctly.
+  * Gives senders visibility into how receiving email servers process their email. You can get a report of how many legitimate emails are sent from your domain, how many emails can’t be authenticated including both legitimate and fraudulent ones.
+  *
+This is a pretty big deal to any organization that relies on email for its day-to-day business. If you are doing email marketing, then DMARC is a must-have tool to make email easy to deliver and reach customers. Pretty much every major consumer-facing mailbox provider like Gmail, Yahoo and Microsoft ask to be sent DMARC-compliant email to make their job of filtering emails easier.
+===== How to Create DMARC Record =====
+DMARC policies are published as a TXT record in DNS.
+==== 1. Create SPF and DKIM records ====
+Before creating a DMARC record, you must create [[tutoriaux:install-email-server:install-email-server-part-4|SPF and DKIM]] records first.
+==== 2. Identifier alignment ====
+Send a test email from your domain, then check the raw email headers at the recipient’s mailbox. You want to make sure the domains in **Return Path**, **From: header** and **d=domain in the DKIM signature** are the same. If the 3 domains are identical, then they are aligned.
+{{ tutoriaux:debian-email:debian-dmarc-gmail-header.png?800 |}}
+If ''Return-Path'' or ''DKIM d='' uses a subdomain instead of the main domain name, then this is called relaxed alignment. If no subdomain is used and the main domain names are the same, it’s called strict alignment.
+==== 3. Setting up the DMARC record ====
+Go to your DNS manager and add a **TXT** record. In the name field, enter ''_dmarc''. In the value field, enter the following:
+<code>
+v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@your-domain.com
+</code>
+Explanation:
+  * **v=DMARC1**: The protocol version is DMARC1.
+  * **p=none**: We choose none as the policy for our domain.
+  * **pct=100**: The percentage of emails from your domain DMARC applies to
+  * **rua** stands for reporting URI for aggregate report. The email address is used to tell receiving email servers where report should be sent.
+     Replace ''dmarc-reports@your-domain.com'' with your real email address that is used to receive aggregate DMARC report.
+There are 3 policies you can choose from:
+  * **none**: tells receiving email servers not to do anything special if DMARC check fails.
+  * **quarantine**: tells receiving email server to put the email into quarantine if DMARC check fails. It must be approved by an admin before it can reach the recipient’s inbox.
+  * **reject**: tells receiving email servers to reject the email if DMARC check fails. Note that not all receiving email servers comply with the //reject// policy. Gmail and Yahoo Mail will reject the email, but Microsoft Mail (Outlook, Hotmail, Live) doesn’t reject the email.
+If your domain name has sent some emails before, then ''p=none'' is a good start. You should analyze the data for some time to see if there are legitimate emails that don’t comply with DMARC. Once you have enough data and fix the delivery problems, you can change the policy from ''none'' to ''quarantine'' or ''reject''.
+If you have a new domain name that has never sent emails before, you can skip ''none'' and ''quarantine'' and set ''p=reject''.
+There’s another tag that you can add to the DMARC record: ''fo''. It has four possible values.
+  * **0** (default): generate reports if **all** underlying authentication mechanisms fail to produce a DMARC pass result
+  * **1**:  generate reports if **any** mechanisms fail.
+  * **d**:  generate a report if DKIM signature failed verification.
+  * **s**: generate a report if SPF failed
+I recommend using ''fo=1'' first to generate more comprehensive DMARC failure reports. When you change to a more restrictive policy, use ''fo=0''.
+<code>
+v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarck-reports@your-domain.com
+</code>
+You can check your DMARC record from Linux terminal with the following command:
+<code bash>dig txt +short _dmarc.example.com</code>
+{{ tutoriaux:debian-email:debian-dmarc-record-dig.png |}}
+You can see that I used two email addresses to receive DMARC report, which I will explain later. There’s another command-line tool (''opendmarc-check'') that you can use to check DMARC record. It’s provided by the ''opendmarc'' package.
+<code bash>sudo apt install opendmarc</code>
+''opendmarc-check'' queries the DNS for a DMARC record for the named domain and then translates the content found to a human-readable form.
+{{ tutoriaux:debian-email:debian-dmarc-check-domain.png |}}
+If you have a domain name that’s not going to send emails, you should use p=reject policy.
+<code bash>v=DMARC1; p=reject; pct=100;</code>
+===== DMARC Test =====
+A good service for DMARC test is https://www.mail-tester.com. Go to the website, you will see a unique email address. Send an email from your domain to this address and then check your score. (This website check all factors that affect email deliverability, not just DMARC.) If DMARC passes, then you will see something like below in the test result.
+[[..:dmarc_alignment_test]]
+Another way to test DMARC is send an email from your domain to your Gmail account. If DMARC is configured correctly then you will see **dmarc=pass** in the **authentication-results** header. (To view email headers in Gmail, click the ''Show Original'' button, which can be found in the drop-down menu on the right side of an opened email.)
+[[..:gmail_spf_and_dkim_check_scalahosting]]
+To pass DMARC check, your emails need to meet one of the following requirements.
+  * SPF pass and the ''Return-Path:'' domain name is the same as the ''From:'' header domain.
+  * DKIM pass and the ''d='' domain in DKIM signature is the same as the ''From:'' header domain.
+By default, DMARC uses relaxed alignment. So the Return-Path domain or the ''d='' domain in DKIM signature can be a subdomain.
+==== How to Interpret DMARC Report ====
+There are two kinds of DMARC reports.
+  * Daily XML-based **aggregate report** generated by Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, etc.
+  * Real-time **forensic reports** (copies of individual pieces of email that fail the DMARC check)
+Normally you only want to receive the aggregate report. The data that DMARC produces is invaluable for understanding what is going on for any given email domain. However, raw DMARC report data is super hard to read and understand. Luckily, [[http://dmarc.postmarkapp.com/|Postmark]] offers a free service to process these reports, presents you a much more readable report. The nice part about Postmark is that you can tell receiving email servers to send XML reports directly to Postmark for processing. So instead of entering your email address in the DMARC record, you enter an email address of postmarkapp.com that is unique to you.
+<code>v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; fo=1; rua=mailto:unique-to-you@dmarc.postmarkapp.com;</code>
+You can also specify multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
+<code>v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; fo=1; rua=mailto:unique-to-you@dmarc.postmarkapp.com,mailto:dmarc-report@your-domain.com;</code>
+After your DMARC record has been verified by Postmark, you will receive a DMARC report weekly every Monday in your email inbox. You don’t need to register an account at Postmark.
+Below is my first weekly report sent from Postmark. mcsignup.com belongs to MailChimp, which is what I use to send newsletters to my mailing list. In my SPF record, I actually allow MailChimp to send emails on my behalf, but I didn’t know that they don’t use my domain name in the Return-Path header for the signup confirmation emails. And they don’t sign emails using my DKIM domain.
+[[..:dmarc-report-analyzer-postmark]]
+There’s also an unknown source that claims to be linuxbabe.com.
+[[..:dmarc_aggregate_report]]
+First, I always treat IP address that doesn’t have reverse DNS record as spam. Then, to identify other unknown sources, I will check if it’s on an email blacklist. debouncer.com tells me that it’s on 13 blacklists. So clearly it’s a spammer trying to impersonate my domain name.
+[[..:identify_unkown_sources_in_dmarc_report]]
+To better understand the unknown source and how your domains are used, you can choose to receive forensic report by adding the ruf tag in DMARC record like below.
+<code>
+v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; fo=1; rua=mailto:unique-to-you@dmarc.postmarkapp.com; ruf=mailto:forensic-report@your-domain.com;
+</code>
+The forensic report contains the copies of emails that failed DMARC check. You can see the email headers, subject lines, and sometimes message body to determine the nature of failed emails. If you recognize the subject line, then it’s more likely to be a forwarded message. Note that some email servers may choose to generate aggregate reports but not forensic report due to privacy concerns and others may only include email headers in the forensic report.
+===== When does SPF or DKIM Fail? =====
+A typical example of SPF failure is when your emails are relayed to the destination email server through a third-party server. And the common situation where DKIM fails is when your emails are sent through a mailing list, which often adds additional headers or sentences to your emails. Actually, a mailing list can cause SPF failure too.
+There are two kinds of mailing lists.
+  * **Announcement mailing list**. Typically used by websites to send newsletters. The mailing list owner can send messages to a large number of subscribers, whereas subscribers can only reply to the mailing list owner.
+  * **Discussion mailing list**, where subscribers can send messages to all other subscribers. This is common in the open-source community. GNU mailman is the most popular software to set up such a mailing list.
+This first kind is easy to tackle because the domain owner is a customer of the mailing list server provider. It’s easy to add the mailing list server to SPF record. Also, the mailing listing server can do DKIM signing for customers.
+The second kind of mailing list is difficult to tackle for domain owners who have users participating in discussions in various mailing lists. The domain owner can’t list all possible discussion mailing list servers in SPF record, and these mailing lists can’t do DKIM signing for other domain names. A possible solution is that the mailing list uses its own address in the ''From:'' header, and adds the original email sender’s address in the ''Reply-To:'' header.
+More details can be found on [[https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC|this GNU mailman wiki page]]. A more practical and promising solution is [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authenticated_Received_Chain|ARC (Authentication Received Chain)]], which basically means that mailing lists do DMARC check and sign the DMARC result. Receiving email servers can trust the ARC signature and override local DMARC check results.
+===== When Should You Switch to p=reject Policy =====
+You should wait enough time to receive lots of DMARC report. Don’t be surprised when you see false positives in your DMARC report. Analyze these false positives and take action to make sure they can pass DMARC check. After that, switch your DMARC policy to ''p=quarantine'' and eventually ''p=reject''. Do not skip ''quarantine'' and go straight to ''reject''. When you switch to a more strict DMARC policy, consider changing the value of ''pct'' tag.
+So the overall process goes like this:
+| p=none;        | pct=100; |
+| p=quarantine;  | pct=30; |
+| p=quarantine;  | pct=70; |
+| p=quarantine;  | pct=100; |
+| p=reject;      | pct=30; |
+| p=reject;      | pct=70; |
+| p=reject;      | pct=100; |
+==== Why I’m still using p=none policy? ====
+Firstly, it’s because of Microsoft. mails forwarded from Microsoft Outlook Mailbox can fail DKIM check, which is bad. For this reason, I cannot set my DMARC policy to ''quarantine'' or ''reject''.
+Another reason is that I’m using MailChimp to send newsletters to my email subscribers. MailChimp uses its own domain in the Return-Path header and its own DKIM signature for the signup confirmation email, which causes DMARC failure.
+The solution to the first problem is deploying ARC (Authenticated Received Chain). Until ARC is implemented on Mailbox providers, I won’t change my DMARC policy.
+To solve the second problem, I need to switch to a self-hosted newsletter app like Mailtrain, instead of using an email service provider (ESP) to send newsletters to email subscribers. That way, I can use my own domain name in the Return-Path header and my own DKIM signature in every email. However, this also means I will need to build a good reputation for my email domain and the IP address of my email server so that my emails can land in my subscribers’ inbox instead of the spam folder. That can take some time and effort.
+==== Update (April 19, 2019) ====
+DKIM alignment in emails forwarded by Microsoft Outlook has improved. Also in February 2019, Mailchimp started using the customer’s domain name in the DKIM signature for the signup confirmation emails, so all Mailchimp emails are now DKIM-aligned. I now begin experimenting with the p=quarantine policy and eventually will switch to the p=reject policy.
+mcsignup dkim alignment
+==== Wrapping Up ====
+Having a p=none policy is better than having no DMARC record. Although p=none cannot prevent email spoofing, at least my legitimate emails have a better chance to be placed in inbox.
+I hope this article helped you understand and deploy DMARC policy. In part 6, I will share with you all my tips on how to get your emails into the recipient’s inbox instead of the spam folder.
+{{page>install-email-server-footer}}

Nox-Rhea WiKi

Outils pour utilisateurs

Outils du site

Différences

Outils de la page